Executive Order 14147: Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government. Signed on January 20, 2025.

Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government

Executive Order 14147
Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government
Signed on January 20, 2025

On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14147, which directs federal agencies to review investigations and enforcement actions conducted over the last four years to determine whether they were politically motivated. The order instructs the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Intelligence Community to compile reports on any actions deemed inconsistent with the policies outlined in the order. The stated goal is to correct past misconduct and prevent the federal government from being used against political opponents. 

🔗 Read the Executive Order on the Federal Register
🔗 Read the White House Announcement


What You Should Know

This order is based on a false narrative that law enforcement was used to target political opponents.

The executive order claims that federal agencies engaged in politically motivated prosecutions and investigations over the last four years. It cites the prosecution of individuals involved in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol while falsely suggesting that Black Lives Matter protestors were not held accountable for criminal activity. The reality is that federal agencies operate under strict legal guidelines, and prosecutions are based on evidence and the law, not political allegiance. Investigations into January 6 and other criminal acts were conducted following due process, with many resulting in convictions. 

The order attempts to discredit and undermine accountability efforts.  

By mandating a review of past investigations and prosecutions, the order opens the door for the dismissal of charges or legal actions taken against individuals who broke the law. This includes efforts to reframe January 6 rioters as victims rather than perpetrators of violence and attacks on democracy. It also creates a precedent where legal accountability can be challenged based on political rhetoric rather than legal merit.  

Federal agencies are being pressured to change enforcement priorities.  

The directive instructs federal agencies to review and report on cases where enforcement actions may have been politically motivated. This places pressure on these agencies to alter their enforcement priorities and potentially avoid investigations that could be politically inconvenient for the administration. This could allow corruption, white-collar crime, and political misconduct to go unchecked.  

The executive order sets the stage for interference in the justice system.  

By ordering a sweeping review of past law enforcement actions, the administration is signaling an intent to influence ongoing and future investigations. This could lead to politically motivated changes in how laws are enforced, weakening the independence of the justice system and increasing the risk of selective prosecution.  


Who Wins?  

Individuals charged with crimes related to January 6  

By portraying the prosecution of January 6 rioters as political persecution, the order provides a pathway for the administration to seek reduced sentences, dismiss cases, or grant pardons to those convicted. This benefits individuals who participated in the attack on the Capitol and could embolden similar actions in the future.  

Politicians and allies who were under investigation  

The executive order creates an opportunity for political allies of the administration to challenge investigations into corruption, financial crimes, and other misconduct. By framing law enforcement efforts as politically motivated, individuals facing legal scrutiny may attempt to use this order to avoid accountability.  

Right-wing media and conspiracy theorists  

This order validates claims pushed by right-wing media that federal law enforcement agencies were engaged in political persecution rather than upholding the law. It reinforces conspiracy theories that frame legitimate investigations as part of a “deep state” agenda, despite a lack of evidence supporting these claims.


Who Loses?  

The rule of law and judicial independence  

By calling past investigations into question and framing them as politically motivated, the order weakens public trust in the justice system. It sets a precedent where legal outcomes can be overturned or dismissed based on political narratives rather than evidence. This threatens the foundational principle that no one is above the law.  

Federal law enforcement agencies and intelligence officials  

The order creates an environment where law enforcement officials may hesitate to pursue investigations involving political figures for fear of being accused of bias. This undermines the ability of federal agencies to enforce laws fairly and without political interference. It also places intelligence officials under scrutiny for performing their duties in accordance with national security priorities.  

Public accountability and transparency  

This order makes it easier for government officials and political allies to avoid scrutiny and legal consequences. By questioning past investigations and legal actions, it erodes mechanisms designed to hold powerful individuals accountable, leading to an increase in unchecked political corruption and misconduct.  


The executive order is framed as an effort to prevent the abuse of government power, but in reality, it is a tool to undermine legal accountability and shield political allies from consequences. It distorts the purpose of law enforcement, creating a dangerous precedent where those in power can retroactively challenge legitimate investigations. If allowed to stand, this order could weaken the justice system, discourage future investigations into political wrongdoing, and embolden efforts to obstruct the rule of law.  


Take Action

Stay informed about ongoing legal investigations and hold officials accountable.  

Understanding how this order is being implemented is critical to preventing its misuse. Follow credible news sources and legal experts who analyze its impact on ongoing investigations. Transparency and public awareness can help prevent the manipulation of law enforcement for political gain.  

Support organizations that fight for judicial independence and accountability.  

Groups that focus on protecting democracy and the integrity of the justice system need support. Legal advocacy organizations, watchdog groups, and investigative journalists play a crucial role in ensuring that the law is applied fairly and without political interference.  

Contact your representatives and demand oversight.  

Elected officials have the power to investigate and challenge executive actions that threaten the integrity of the justice system. Call or email your representatives to voice concerns about this order and advocate for policies that protect judicial independence.  

Push back against misinformation and propaganda.  

Right-wing media and political operatives will use this order to spread false claims about law enforcement and legal accountability. Fact-check claims, challenge misleading narratives, and share accurate information to counter efforts to discredit legitimate investigations.  


Government accountability and the rule of law should never be subject to political manipulation. This order sets a dangerous precedent that undermines justice and weakens the institutions that protect democracy. Stay informed, challenge misinformation, and take action to uphold the principles of fairness and accountability. 

Jessica Felts

Jessica Felts is a researcher, political analyst, and fact-checker dedicated to uncovering the truth behind political rhetoric, policy decisions, and public discourse. With a background in technology, accessibility, and healthcare, she brings a unique, analytical perspective to the intersection of politics, science, and social issues. Through her work, Jessica is committed to breaking down complex narratives, debunking misinformation, and providing clear, evidence-based insights to help audiences stay informed and empowered.

More From Author

Executive Order 14148: Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions. Signed January 20, 2025.

Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions